Home > Videos | π¨βπ«ππ΅ Warren Mosler
π°π¦πΉππ MMT vs. Austrian School Debate
π€ AI Summary
- π° (MMT) The US government, as a sovereign currency issuer with a floating exchange rate, can run unlimited nominal deficits.
- π― (MMT) Full employment can be sustained because the Treasury can sell unlimited securities at interest rates set by the Fed.
- π· (MMT) The core policy proposal is a Job Guarantee for anyone willing and able to work, assisting the transition to private sector employment.
- π₯ (MMT) A Health Care Proposal suggests providing everyone $5,000 annually (a nominal starting point) to address healthcare needs.
- π¦ (MMT) The FDIC Insurance cap should be removed because it favors large banks and supports the unnecessary money market fund industry.
- π‘οΈ (MMT) The Fed should provide unsecured Bank liquidity.
- π§ (Austrian) Economic explanations must be centered in the individual (methodological individualism).
- π (Austrian) Macroeconomic outcomes must be explained by building up from the incentives guiding individual behavior (micro-foundations).
- π (Austrian) The business cycle is caused by central banks, such as the Federal Reserve, keeping interest rates artificially low.
- π«§ (Austrian) The dot-com bubble (late 90s) was caused by the Greenspan Fed setting artificially low rates, pushing asset prices above their true value.
- π« (MMT) The current monetary system rests on the stateβs monopoly on money, enforced through coercion.
- π‘ (Austrian) The focus should be on changing the system away from government monopoly rather than just tweaking current arrangements.
π€ Evaluation
-
βοΈ The debate features two heterodox schools of thoughtβMMT and the Austrian Schoolβthat both fundamentally stand apart from mainstream neoclassical economics (John Carney on MMT and Austrian Economics).
-
π€ Both MMT and the Austrian School agree that the modern fiat monetary system removes the traditional revenue constraints on governments compared to commodity-based systems (John Carney on MMT and Austrian Economics).
-
βοΈ A core difference is in methodology and the origin of money (History and origin of money in MMT and Austrian Economics: The difference methodology makes?).
-
π¦πΉ The Austrian School uses a deductivist methodology, focusing on individual agency, which suggests money spontaneously arises from barter (History and origin of money in MMT and Austrian Economics: The difference methodology makes?).
-
π MMT follows the state theory of money (Chartalism), asserting that the state creates money to appropriate resources and impose taxes, based on historical observation (History and origin of money in MMT and Austrian Economics: The difference methodology makes?).
-
πΈ A key policy disagreement centers on the risk of inflation and the efficacy of government spending (John Carney on MMT and Austrian Economics).
-
π₯ Austrians worry that government control of money will inevitably lead to runaway inflation (John Carney on MMT and Austrian Economics).
-
π‘οΈ MMT is more confident in using taxation to manage aggregate demand and combat inflation caused by excessive spending (John Carney on MMT and Austrian Economics).
-
β Critics, such as those in Modern Monetary Theory: A Wrong Compass for Decision-Making (Intereconomics), argue MMT is based on an outdated state of economic science and its claims regarding policy are highly exaggerated.
-
π¬ Topics to Explore for a Better Understanding:
- π The role of real resource constraints versus nominal financial constraints in MMT policy implementation (THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AUSTRIANS AND MMTβERS).
- ποΈ The normative critique of the existing political system offered by the Austrian School and its practical implications for policy today (An MMT vs Austrian Debate Post-Mortem Part V of V: Coda | New Economic Perspectives).
- π How monetary policy credibility and currency competition affect the public acceptance and value of fiat currency, a point critics say MMT fails to explain (Modern Monetary Theory: A Wrong Compass for Decision-Making - Intereconomics).
β Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
β Q: What is the main difference between Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and the Austrian School of Economics?
β¨ A: The main difference lies in their view of money and government. π¦πΉ The Austrian School views money as a spontaneously created medium of exchange and believes government intervention, particularly central bank rate manipulation, causes the business cycle. ποΈ MMT views money as a creature of the state (Chartalism) and asserts that sovereign governments are only constrained by real resources (inflation), not by the need to raise taxes or borrow money.
β Q: What is the Austrian Schoolβs primary explanation for economic crises and recessions?
π A: The Austrian School attributes crises, like the dot-com bubble or 2008 financial crisis, to malinvestment caused by central banks. π¦ Specifically, they argue that when central banks keep interest rates artificially low, it sends false signals to businesses, encouraging unsustainable investments that eventually collapse, leading to a recession.
β Q: How does MMT propose to maintain full employment in an economy?
π οΈ A: MMTβs key proposal for achieving and maintaining full employment is the Job Guarantee program. πΌ Under this program, the government acts as an employer of last resort, offering a job to anyone willing and able to work. π This creates an automatic economic stabilizer, expanding government payrolls during recessions and contracting them during private sector expansions.
π Book Recommendations
βοΈ Similar
- π Seven Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy by Warren Mosler: π‘ This book provides an accessible introduction to MMTβs core operational understandings of fiat currency, debt, and taxes, aligning closely with the MMT perspective in the debate.
- π°πβ‘οΈππ³οΈ The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and the Birth of the Peopleβs Economy by Stephanie Kelton: π― A popular, high-profile explanation of MMT principles, focusing on how governments can leverage their sovereign currency power to fund public goals, similar to the MMT proposals discussed.
π Contrasting
- π Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt: π A classic free-market text that warns against the unintended, long-term consequences of government intervention, providing a methodological contrast to MMTβs focus on fiscal policy.
- π Americaβs Great Depression by Murray Rothbard: π This book offers a comprehensive Austrian critique of the role of the Federal Reserve and government policy in causing and exacerbating the Great Depression, directly supporting the Austrian position on central bank credit expansion.
π¨ Creatively Related
- ποΈπ° Debt: The First 5,000 Years by David Graeber: π Explores the historical and anthropological origins of money as debt and a unit of account, lending intellectual depth to the Chartalist (state theory of money) foundation of MMT.
- π Capitalism and Freedom by Milton Friedman: π½ A highly influential work of classical liberal thought that champions free markets and advocates for limited government, offering a policy framework that strongly contrasts with the large-scale government programs proposed by MMT.