Home > Books

πŸ’ΈπŸ˜‡ The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy

πŸ›’ The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

πŸ’°πŸ’‘πŸ“‰ Widely accepted economic beliefs regarding government finance, debt, and taxation are fundamentally flawed in a sovereign currency system, hindering prosperity and full employment by perpetuating unnecessary austerity and misinformed policy decisions.

πŸ€– AI Summary

πŸ”‘ Core Philosophy: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)

  • 🏦 Monetary Sovereignty: Governments issuing their own fiat currency are not financially constrained; they cannot run out of money.
  • πŸ’Έ Spending Precedes Taxation: Government must spend currency into existence before taxes can collect it. Taxes do not fund spending.
  • πŸ”₯ Inflation Constraint: The only true limit on government spending is inflation, occurring when spending exceeds available real resources (labor, materials).
  • 🎯 Full Employment Goal: A primary policy objective is to achieve and maintain full employment, often via a Job Guarantee program.

🚫 The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds

  • 🚫 Fraud #1: Government Must Tax/Borrow to Spend. False. A sovereign currency issuer creates money when it spends.
  • 🚫 Fraud #2: Deficits Burden Future Generations. False. Future generations inherit real resources and productive capacity, not a financial burden from internal debt.
  • 🚫 Fraud #3: Government Deficits Reduce Savings. False. By accounting identity, government deficits are private sector surpluses.
  • 🚫 Fraud #4: Social Security is Broken. False. A sovereign government can always make payments denominated in its own currency.
  • 🚫 Fraud #5: Trade Deficits are Unsustainable. False. Trade deficits provide real goods to the importing nation; currency sent abroad represents future claims on domestic goods.
  • 🚫 Fraud #6: Savings Fund Investment. False. Investment often creates its own financing; bank lending creates deposits.
  • 🚫 Fraud #7: Higher Deficits Today Mean Higher Taxes Tomorrow. False. Taxes are for managing inflation and demand, not funding spending.

βš–οΈ Evaluation

  • πŸͺ™ MMT’s Description of Monetary Operations: Economists acknowledge MMT’s accurate description of how a sovereign government’s central bank and treasury operationally create and spend money, particularly that government spending precedes taxation and that bonds function as interest-bearing savings accounts rather than funding mechanisms for spending.
  • πŸ›οΈ Fiscal vs. Monetary Policy: MMT advocates argue fiscal policy is more effective for managing aggregate demand and achieving full employment, with monetary policy passively supporting low interest rates. Mainstream economics typically assigns independent roles to both, with central banks managing inflation via interest rates.
  • πŸ“ˆ Inflation Control: MMT posits that inflation is the primary constraint on government spending and can be managed through taxation or a Job Guarantee program. Critics argue MMT lacks a credible theory of inflation, underestimating its potential risks and the complexity of managing it solely through fiscal tools, especially prior to full employment.
  • ⚠️ Government Debt and Default: MMT asserts that a sovereign currency issuer cannot involuntarily default on debt denominated in its own currency. While technically true for domestic currency debt, critics warn that a government could choose to default if the alternative is hyperinflation, and printing money for spending does not negate the real economic costs or resource allocation trade-offs.
  • πŸ“‰ The Crowding Out Debate: MMT rejects the conventional loanable funds theory, arguing that government deficits do not necessarily crowd out private investment by raising interest rates; instead, expansionary fiscal policy can even lower interest rates by increasing bank reserves. Mainstream economists often view large government borrowing as potentially competing for available savings, thus increasing interest rates.
  • πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’Ό Practicality and Political Economy: MMT proposes shifting significant economic management to fiscal authorities (Congress/Treasury). Critics highlight the difficulty and undesirability of consolidating monetary and fiscal policy due to political motivations and the importance of central bank independence.
  • πŸ“Š Empirical Evidence and Formal Modeling: Proponents cite historical examples (like post-2008 stimulus not causing hyperinflation) to support MMT concepts. Critics often point to MMT’s lack of formal mathematical modeling and repetitive academic publications, making it difficult to verify assertions or compare with other economic theories.

πŸ” Topics for Further Understanding

  • πŸ“œ The historical evolution of monetary systems (e.g., gold standard to fiat currency).
  • πŸ›‘οΈ The role of central bank independence in macroeconomic stability.
  • 🌍 International implications of MMT for countries without monetary sovereignty (e.g., Eurozone members).
  • πŸ–¨οΈ Quantitative Easing (QE) and its relationship to MMT’s views on government securities.
  • πŸ—³οΈ The political economy of implementing MMT-inspired policies, such as a Job Guarantee.
  • 🧠 Behavioral economics perspectives on government spending and public perception of debt.
  • πŸ’± The interaction between fiscal deficits, trade imbalances, and exchange rates in various economic models.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

πŸ’‘ Q: What is the main argument of The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy?

βœ… A: The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy argues that widely held beliefs about government finance, particularly that a sovereign government needs to tax or borrow to spend, are fundamentally false and lead to suboptimal economic policies.

πŸ’‘ Q: Who is Warren Mosler, and what is his connection to Modern Monetary Theory?

βœ… A: Warren Mosler is an American hedge fund executive and economist who is widely recognized as a co-founder and key proponent of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), and the author of The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy.

πŸ’‘ Q: Does The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy suggest governments can spend an unlimited amount of money?

βœ… A: The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy posits that governments with monetary sovereignty can spend without financial constraint in their own currency, but it explicitly states that the real limit on spending is the economy’s productive capacity, beyond which inflation would occur.

πŸ’‘ Q: How does The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy view the purpose of taxes?

βœ… A: In The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy, taxes are primarily seen as a tool to manage aggregate demand and inflation, not to fund government spending. They also drive demand for the government’s currency.

πŸ’‘ Q: What is the Job Guarantee concept mentioned in relation to The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy?

βœ… A: The Job Guarantee, often associated with the ideas in The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy and MMT, is a policy proposal where the government acts as an employer of last resort, offering a job to anyone willing and able to work, aiming to achieve full employment and price stability.

πŸ“š Book Recommendations

πŸ“– Similar Books

πŸ“– Contrasting Books

  • πŸ“— Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt
  • πŸ“œ The Road to Serfdom by F.A. Hayek
  • 🧾 Principles of Economics by N. Gregory Mankiw

🫡 What Do You Think?

πŸ€” Which innocent fraud of economic policy do you believe is the most pervasive misconception in public discourse, and why? What are your thoughts on the practical feasibility of implementing MMT’s core policy recommendations in today’s global economy?