bagrounds.org

8 min read

Home > Videos

🗺️✂️🏛️🗣️ American Conversations: Gerrymandering with Kate Compton Barr and Sam Wang

🤖 AI Summary

The video discussion features gerrymandering experts Sam Wang, Director of the Princeton Gerrymandering Project, and political activist Kate Compton Barr.

  • 🗳️ Gerrymandering definition: Gerrymandering is when politicians select their voters, rather than voters selecting their politicians [05:30].
  • 📉 Competition is vanishing: The number of competitive seats around the country is becoming extremely small [04:24].
  • 🗺️ Partisan redistricting is rampant: Legislators are choosing to redistrict mid-decade, which is historically rare, with six major events recently, including five imposed by legislators in states like Texas and North Carolina [04:31], [04:53].
  • 📐 Techniques of gerrymandering: Partisan gerrymandering primarily uses two techniques:
    • 📦 Packing: Concentrating the opposition’s voters into a few districts, giving them huge but wasted majorities [06:08].
    • ✂️ Cracking: Splitting the opposition’s voters among multiple districts to give them no hope of winning anywhere [06:14].
  • 🛑 Gerrymandering removes accountability: Gerrymandering is pernicious because it eliminates the link between voters and representatives, making races non-responsive [07:41]. Elected officials don’t have to answer to their constituents, only to wealthy donors and big business who put them in power [22:20], [22:35].
  • 🤦 Dummy mandering risk: Dummy mandering occurs when the party that drew the maps cuts the margins too close, causing the gerrymander to backfire when there’s a large swing in the opposite direction, as may be possible in Texas with the Hispanic population swing [12:08], [12:27].
  • 🚪 Primary strategy: In a gerrymandered district, the primary is the real election [03:43], [09:34]. Candidates can leverage the notoriously low turnout in primaries to win with a small number of votes, providing a way to contest a rigged system [09:04], [09:20].
  • 🎯 Voter suppression risk: Narrowing the number of competitive districts makes it easier to suppress the vote in those few districts because it takes fewer resources and can be more targeted [14:17], [14:25].
  • 🚨 Targeting the vote: Recent Department of Justice announcements about observing elections in specific counties in California and New Jersey, especially those with concentrated competitive districts, look like a rehearsal for aggressive actions to hold back the vote in the future, possibly involving entities like ICE agents [15:49], [16:22], [28:28].

🤔 Evaluation

The video’s central theme, that partisan gerrymandering is anti-democratic, is well-supported by highly reliable, non-partisan sources.

  • 🤝 Agreement on Impact: The Brennan Center for Justice agrees with the video, stating that gerrymandering is undemocratic because it ensures electoral outcomes regardless of voter preferences, allowing politicians to choose their voters. The Center for American Progress reports that gerrymandering shifted an average of 59 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2012, 2014, and 2016 elections, disproportionately favoring one party, echoing the video’s claim that a party can win a majority of seats with a minority of the vote (Brennan Center for Justice, Center for American Progress).
  • 🔄 Agreement on Techniques: The video’s explanation of packing and cracking is confirmed by multiple sources. Packing concentrates opposition voters to waste their votes, while cracking splits them across districts to dilute their power. This confirms the direct language used by the speaker (Brennan Center for Justice, Street Law).
  • 👤 Agreement on Accountability: The video claims that gerrymandering removes accountability by reducing competition. A Harvard study cited by Street Law supports this, finding that lawmakers in non-competitive seats have less incentive to meet the needs of voters, focusing instead on extreme members of their base.
  • ⚖️ Contrasting Perspective on Partisanship: While the video focuses on abolishing partisan gerrymandering, political historian Julian E. Zelizer offers a contrasting perspective in his upcoming book In Defense of Partisanship (Columbia Global Reports), arguing that responsible partisanship, properly structured, could actually benefit democracy. This view suggests that the problem is not partisanship itself, but its current irresponsible form, which could be channeled toward more democratically accountable policymaking.
  • ❓ Topics to Explore for a Better Understanding:
    • 📜 The Rucho Decision: The video touches on the legal environment but does not explicitly name the Supreme Court decision in Rucho v. Common Cause (2019), which ruled that federal courts cannot review partisan gerrymandering claims. Understanding this decision is crucial, as it fundamentally altered the legal landscape, placing the responsibility on state courts and legislative action (Street Law, Brennan Center for Justice).
    • ↔️ The Role of Independent Commissions: The video mentions ballot initiatives but does not delve into the proven effectiveness of independent redistricting commissions, such as those established in Michigan and California, which are often cited as the most effective structural reform against partisan bias.
    • 🥴 Dummy Mandering Data: While the video mentions the risk of “dummy mandering,” a deeper dive into the specific demographic shifts (like the Hispanic population swing mentioned) and the analytical models (like those from the Princeton Gerrymandering Project) that predict this backfire would provide a more robust understanding of the risk to map-drawers.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

❓ Q: What is partisan gerrymandering and how does it impact American elections?

🗳️ A: Partisan gerrymandering is the practice where politicians draw electoral district boundaries to benefit their own political party, effectively choosing their voters instead of the reverse. 📈 This impacts elections by creating non-competitive districts, reducing accountability, and allowing one party to win a majority of legislative seats even if they receive a minority of the statewide vote.

❓ Q: What are the two main techniques politicians use to gerrymander districts?

📐 A: The two primary techniques are packing and cracking. 📦 Packing concentrates voters of the opposition party into a few districts, wasting their surplus votes. ✂️ Cracking splits a party’s voters among multiple districts, diluting their voting power so they cannot form a majority in any single district.

❓ Q: Why is the primary election so important in a heavily gerrymandered district?

🚪 A: In a heavily gerrymandered district, the outcome of the general election is often predetermined by the map, making it non-competitive. 🔑 Because of low turnout, the primary election becomes the true contest for power. Unaffiliated voters and members of the majority party can use their votes in the primary to select a candidate who is more responsive to the general population’s needs, challenging the incumbent’s machine.

❓ Q: What is dummy mandering?

🤦 A: Dummy mandering is a term for a gerrymander that unexpectedly backfires on the party that drew the maps. 📉 This happens when the map-drawers cut the partisan margins too thin, and a sudden, large swing in voter preference (e.g., a 14-point shift) causes the supposedly safe districts to flip, handing power to the opposing party.

📚 Book Recommendations

↔️ Similar

  • 🗳️⬇️🏛️ One Person, No Vote: How Voter Suppression Is Destroying Our Democracy by Carol Anderson. 📜 This book examines the history of voter suppression tactics beyond gerrymandering, detailing how laws and policies have been used to systematically block or dilute the votes of minority groups, which is closely related to the video’s theme of diminishing electoral competition.
  • Partisan Gerrymandering and the Construction of American Democracy by Erik J. Engstrom. 🏛️ This offers a deep, historical analysis of congressional redistricting from the founding of the US up to the 1960s, showing how gerrymandering consistently shaped election outcomes and the partisan control of the House of Representatives.
  • Gerrymandering the States: Partisanship, Race, and the Transformation of American Federalism by Alex Keena, Michael Latner, Anthony J. McGann, and Charles Anthony Smith. ⚖️ This book provides a contemporary analysis of the redistricting wars at the state legislative level, focusing on the role of partisanship and race, and is highly relevant to the speakers’ concerns about state-level manipulation.

🆚 Contrasting

  • In Defense of Partisanship by Julian E. Zelizer. 🗣️ This book challenges the conventional wisdom that partisanship is the root of political dysfunction, arguing that responsible partisanship could actually be a force for functional democracy and reform, suggesting an alternative framing to the anti-gerrymandering position.
  • Gerrymandering: The Politics of Redistricting in the United States by Stephen K. Medvic. 🧐 This provides a balanced analysis of the redistricting process, acknowledging the troubling aspects of gerrymandering while recognizing that drawing district lines is inherently political and that no “perfectly fair” or apolitical solution exists.
  • The Long Red Thread: How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in US House Elections by Kyle Kondik. 📉 This book examines the geographic concentration of Democratic voters in urban centers as a major, non-gerrymandered cause of the Republican advantage in the House, which provides a key counter-argument to the idea that line-drawing is the sole cause of the current political imbalance.

🎨 Creatively Related

  • The Politics Industry: How Political Innovation Can Break Partisan Gridlock and Save Our Democracy by Katherine M. Gehl and Michael E. Porter. 💡 This book views the political system as a dysfunctional industry that requires market-based innovation to fix, such as using open primaries and ranked-choice voting, offering structural solutions that complement the goal of ending gerrymandering.
  • 🗳️🇺🇸 The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States by Alexander Keyssar. 📜 This provides a broad, contested history of suffrage in the U.S., placing the modern fight against gerrymandering in the long arc of struggles for a more inclusive democracy.
  • Bushmanders & Bullwinkles: How Politicians Manipulate Electronic Maps and Census Data to Win Elections by Mark S. Monmonier. 💻 This book explores the technology and data-driven methods used by politicians, including the misuse of electronic maps and census data, offering a look behind the curtain at the tools of modern gerrymandering.

🐦 Tweet

Graph View

Backlinks