Home > Reflections | โฎ๏ธ โญ๏ธ

2025-04-18 | ๐Ÿคฅ๐Ÿ“ฃ Propaganda ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

reflections-2025-04-18

๐Ÿ“š Books

๐Ÿ“ฐ News

The website presents five bullet points in favor of the lab leak theory. None of them are new, noted Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada.
โ€Every one of the five pieces of evidence supporting the lab leak hypothesis โ€ฆ is factually incorrect, embellished, or presented in a misleading way,โ€ Rasmussen wrote in an email.
โ€But making evidence-based arguments in good faith about the pandemicโ€™s origin is not the purpose of this document. This is pure propaganda, intended to justify the systematic devastation of the federal government, particularly programs devoted to public health and biomedical research,โ€ Rasmussen added.

๐Ÿฆ‹ Bluesky

2025-04-18 | ๐Ÿคฅ๐Ÿ“ฃ Propaganda ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

AI Q: ๐Ÿ“ข How do you distinguish between legitimate information and digital propaganda?

๐Ÿ“š Behavioral Science | ๐Ÿ“ฐ Disinformation | ๐Ÿง  Cognitive Bias | ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ Political Influence
https://bagrounds.org/reflections/2025-04-18

โ€” Bryan Grounds (@bagrounds.bsky.social) 2026-04-20T03:14:50.000Z

๐Ÿ˜ Mastodon

Post by @bagrounds@mastodon.social
View on Mastodon