Home > Books

🕵️📜 Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA

🛒 Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

🕵️‍♂️📉🇺🇸 A meticulously researched, yet deeply critical, account exposing decades of the CIA’s operational failures, internal mismanagement, and profound impact on U.S. national security, all presented without anonymous sources.

🤖 AI Summary

Genesis & Early Years

  • 🌟 Established 1947, post-WWII, successor to OSS.
  • 🎯 Initial mission: inform President, prevent surprise attacks.
  • ❓ Vague mandate led to early controversies and funding misuse (Marshall Plan for émigré spying).
  • ⚠️ Key failures: not predicting Soviet atomic bomb (1949), intelligence gaps (Kuwait invasion 1990).
  • 🗣️ Early criticisms: Forrestal (1948).

Core Themes & Criticisms

  • 📉 Consistent failure to predict major events (Soviet bomb, Kuwait invasion, 9/11).
  • 🤦 Incompetence and arrogance leading to blunders.
  • 💥 Misuse of covert operations with often disastrous consequences (Iran 1953, Guatemala 1954, Chile 1973).
  • ⚖️ Lack of accountability and self-deception regarding successes vs. failures.
  • 🗑️ Legacy of Ashes: failures jeopardizing national security.
  • 📝 On the record approach: no anonymous sources, full attribution.

Key Figures & Operations

  • 🕴️ Allen Dulles: Director during significant covert actions.
  • 🕵️ Kim Philby: Mole within the agency, highlighting counterintelligence failures.
  • 🗣️ Richard Helms: CIA Director, recognized for honesty on Vietnam War realities.
  • ⚙️ Robert Gates: CIA Director, reconfigured agency for efficiency post-Cold War.
  • 🌍 Covert Actions: Iran, Guatemala, Chile coups; Bay of Pigs; Vietnam War; Iran-Contra; War on Terror; Iraq WMD intelligence.

Weiner’s Perspective

  • 🎯 CIA has failed to create a first-rate spy service.
  • 🌟 Reputation maintained despite terrible record, blunders buried.
  • 🛠️ Calls for reform: oversight, transparency, focus on intelligence gathering.
  • ⭐ Historical successes were rare exceptions.

CIA’s Response

  • 😠 Angered by the book, termed it unbalanced.
  • 💬 Disputed Weiner’s interpretation of successes and failures.

🔍 Evaluation

  • ⭐ Legacy of Ashes is praised for its rigorous research, utilizing over 50,000 documents and hundreds of interviews, including those with ten former CIA Directors.
  • ✅ The book’s on the record approach, avoiding anonymous sources, lends significant credibility.
  • 🎯 Weiner’s central thesis is that the CIA has consistently failed in its core mission of informing presidents and preventing strategic surprises, often leading to disastrous outcomes.
  • 🤔 Critics, including some intelligence specialists and the CIA itself, argue the book is overly critical, unbalanced, and contains factual errors. For instance, some argue Weiner downplays the agency’s role in preventing a hot Cold War or fails to credit specific successes.
  • 📚 Some reviewers note that while critical, the book avoids speculative conspiracy theories by relying on documented evidence.
  • ✍️ The book’s narrative style, while dense, is described as journalistic and allows readers to form their own judgments.
  • ⚖️ Comparisons exist regarding the CIA’s role in foreign policy, with some sources emphasizing its importance in preventing attacks and informing policymakers, while Weiner’s work focuses on the failures of this role.

🔍 Topics for Further Understanding

  • 🌍 The evolution of U.S. signals intelligence agencies prior to the CIA’s formation (e.g., MI-8).
  • ❄️ The specific intelligence failures and successes during the Cold War beyond overt confrontations (e.g., the role of spies like Kim Philby).
  • ⚖️ The ethical considerations and legal frameworks governing CIA covert operations and special activities.
  • 🌎 The impact of the CIA’s actions on specific regions and political outcomes (e.g., Latin America, the Middle East, Africa).
  • 🌐 Comparative analysis of intelligence agencies in other major powers versus the CIA’s structure and effectiveness.
  • 🤝 The internal culture and recruitment practices of the CIA throughout its history, particularly concerning diversity and background.
  • 🏛️ The relationship between the CIA, Congress, and presidential administrations in terms of oversight and accountability.
  • 🛰️ The evolution of intelligence gathering techniques and technologies used by the CIA (e.g., U-2, spy satellites).

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

💡 Q: What is the central argument of Tim Weiner’s Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA?

✅ A: The central argument is that the CIA, despite its creation to prevent major intelligence failures like Pearl Harbor, has been plagued by consistent mismanagement, incompetence, and a series of significant operational blunders, ultimately failing to create a first-rate spy service and jeopardizing national security.

💡 Q: Why did Tim Weiner’s book Legacy of Ashes anger the CIA?

✅ A: The CIA was angered because the book presents a highly critical, unbalanced view of the agency, focusing extensively on its failures, missteps, and questionable operations, contrary to how the agency may perceive its own successes.

💡 Q: What makes Legacy of Ashes different from previous histories of the CIA?

✅ A: Legacy of Ashes is distinguished by its commitment to using only on the record sources, meaning no anonymous sources, extensive declassified documents, and hundreds of interviews with CIA veterans, including former directors.

💡 Q: Did the CIA have any successes according to Legacy of Ashes?

✅ A: While the book primarily focuses on failures, it acknowledges rare instances of success or periods of relative competence, such as CIA Director Richard Helms’ honesty regarding the Vietnam War with President Johnson, and Robert Gates’s restructuring efforts after the Cold War, but frames these as exceptions rather than the norm.

💡 Q: What does the title Legacy of Ashes refer to?

✅ A: The title is derived from a remark by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, suggesting that the agency’s failures have resulted in a legacy of ashes for future generations, signifying destruction and a loss of potential due to ongoing mistakes.

📚 Book Recommendations

Similar Books

  • 📖 Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001 by Steve Coll: Explores the CIA’s complex history in Afghanistan, directly leading up to 9/11.
  • 📖 The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America’s Secret Government by David Talbot: A critical biography of Allen Dulles, focusing on the CIA’s covert actions and influence during the Cold War.
  • 📖 The Quiet Americans: Four CIA Spies at the Dawn of the Cold War by Scott Anderson: Details the formative years of the CIA through the lives of key figures.

Contrasting Books

  • 📖 From the Shadows: The Ultimate Insider’s Story of Iran, Contras, and the President, the CIA, and the Deep State by Robert M. Gates: Offers a perspective from a former CIA Director and Secretary of Defense, potentially providing a more internal or defense-oriented view.
  • 📖 The Spymasters: How the CIA Directors Shape History and the Future by Chris Whipple: Focuses on the leaders of the CIA, offering insights into their strategies and challenges from a leadership perspective.
  • 📖 The Art of Intelligence by Henry A. Crumpton: A former CIA operations officer’s account, likely focusing on the practical aspects and challenges of intelligence work from an operational standpoint.
  • 📖 The Invisible Government: The CIA and the CIA’s Role in U.S. Foreign Policy by David Wise and Thomas B. Ross: An early, landmark book that shed light on the CIA’s clandestine operations and influence on foreign policy.
  • 📖 Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America by John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr: Provides a crucial counterpoint by detailing the operations and successes of the CIA’s primary adversary during the Cold War.
  • 📖 The Company: A Novel of the CIA by Robert Littell: A fictional, yet insightful, exploration of the CIA’s inner workings and operatives across decades of Cold War espionage.

🫵 What Do You Think?

What is the most crucial reform needed for the CIA to better serve national security in the 21st century? Should the agency prioritize intelligence gathering over covert action, or is a balance essential?