π₯Όπ¦·π§ What happened when Calgary removed fluoride from its water supply
π€ AI Summary
ποΈ Historical Context: π¦· Fluoride was initially added to drinking water in the 1940s after π¨ββοΈ dentists observed that people with naturally high fluoride levels had teeth resistant to decay [00:39].
π£οΈ Arguments Against Fluoridation:
π£οΈ RFK Jr. argues that fluoride is unnecessary due to the prevalence of πͺ₯ fluoridated toothpaste and π¦ mouthwashes [01:37].
π§ He also cites studies linking fluoride to π IQ loss [01:46].
π§ͺ Counterarguments:
π§ Research indicates that fluoridated water provides additional benefits beyond πͺ₯ toothpaste [02:15].
π€ The link between fluoridation and π IQ loss is not definitively established at the levels used in community water systems [02:31].
π¨π¦ Calgary Case Study:
π In 2011, Calgary stopped fluoridating its water, leading to a π¬ study on the impacts [02:52].
π The study revealed a significant increase in π¦· tooth decay among children in Calgary compared to Edmonton, which continued fluoridation. Specifically, after Calgary stopped fluoridation, 65% of children experienced π¦· tooth decay, compared to 55% in Edmonton, where fluoridation continued [03:53] [04:03].
β A decade later, voters in Calgary opted to reintroduce fluoride [04:03].
π Broader Implications: π€ The decision to fluoridate water involves a larger discussion about public support and π° resources for ensuring good π¦· oral and πͺ overall health [05:26].