Home > Videos

🧑‍🔬📉🇺🇸🔚 Top researchers consider leaving U.S. amid funding cuts: ‘The science world is ending’

🤖 AI Summary

• 📊 Seventy-five percent of U.S. researchers are considering leaving the country, according to a poll from the journal Nature [00:00].
• 🔬 Federal spending cuts forced the National Science Foundation to suspend $1 billion in grants [02:07].
• 🛑 These cuts directly hit UCLA’s Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics, where Professor Terence Tao, hailed as the Mozart of Math, directs special projects [02:19].
• 😟 Professor Tao is now concerned about existential issues, like departments possibly closing down or drastically reducing their research component [01:56], forcing him into a life of fund-raising and triage plans [02:25].
• 🤔 The White House has cited multiple, often unclear, reasons for the cuts, including opposition to DEI policies and a battle over antisemitism and wokeness at universities [02:37].
• ✈️ The uncertainty and instability in funding is causing many scientists, including Tao, to weigh leaving the U.S., with Tao having been contacted by departments from Europe, Australia, and China [02:57].
• 🚪 A brain drain may already be underway, as seen with biomedical engineer Daniella Fodera, whose NIH grant for research on uterine fibroids was canceled, leading her to shift focus toward finding a research position abroad, particularly in Europe [03:30].
• 📉 The funding for a Ph.D. program in neuroscience at Ohio State University is no longer guaranteed, changing Anna Darling’s outlook on being a scientist in the U.S. and her freedom to do the research she wants [05:07].
• 🌍 Biochemist Stephen Jones already left the U.S. for Lithuania after noticing a rise in anti-science sentiment, seeking a place where his work is valued and respected by the scientific and public community [05:51].
• 📈 Since last year, the number of U.S.-based scientists seeking employment outside the country has risen by 30 percent, with many applying to jobs in Canada, Europe, and China [06:59].
• 💸 Other nations are seizing the opportunity; the European Union and France recently pledged a half-billion euros in grants to entice scientists to their universities [06:45].
• 💔 Shutting down labs will have huge consequences for the economy, causing students to leave, ideas to be lost, and experiments to be ruined [07:40].
• 🚧 Professor Tao is critical of an administration mind-set that is alien to him, stating it is not coming from the public interest and that one person who doesn’t understand the facilities can’t just wreck everything [08:14].

🤔 Evaluation

• 🚨 Concerns over a scientific brain drain are widely supported by other organizations, which echo the video’s findings.
  • 🏛️ The National Academies also express concern that budget cuts will lead to fewer students being trained and fewer top young researchers coming to America, suggesting the brain drain will reverse and the best and brightest may find it too hard to get grants (‘America can’t be great without great science. That is where the Academies can help.’ by National Academies).
  • 💣 The organization Big Think describes the funding cuts as an extinction-level event for American science, noting unprecedented federal cuts and a rapidly changing situation since late January 2025 (American science to soon face its largest brain drain in history by Big Think).
  • 📉 The Association of American Universities (AAU) reports that overall, the administration proposed cutting federal funding for all research by 22% and basic research by 34%, which would effectively cede the race to China, whose research spending is expected to grow by 10% (Federal Research Cuts Threaten U.S. Innovation and Leadership by AAU).
  • 🎓 The AAU also notes NSF awards have dropped 50% in 2025 compared to recent years, and federal cuts are forcing universities to reduce Ph.D. admissions, damaging the STEM pipeline (Federal Research Cuts Threaten U.S. Innovation and Leadership by AAU).
• ✅ Topics to explore for a better understanding include:
  • ⚖️ The actual rationale provided by the administration for tying funding cuts to political and cultural issues like DEI and wokeness, and the legal or policy mechanisms used to implement these cuts.
  • 📈 The long-term economic impact of the current brain drain on U.S. GDP, innovation, and tax revenue, with specific projections or models.
  • 🌎 The specific incentive programs offered by other nations, such as the European Union, France, and China, that are successfully attracting U.S. researchers.
  • 🧪 The historical precedents for scientific brain drain in the U.S. and the success of past efforts to regain research excellence after periods of decline.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

🌎 Q: What is causing the potential brain drain of top researchers from the U.S.?

🌎 A: The potential brain drain is caused by unprecedented federal funding cuts to major science organizations like the National Science Foundation and the NIH. 💰 This instability, coupled with the administration tying funding to political issues like opposition to DEI policies and wokeness, has created an environment of uncertainty that is pushing scientists to seek more stable and welcoming research environments abroad in countries like China, Australia, and those in Europe.

🔬 Q: How are federal budget cuts impacting scientific research in the United States?

🔬 A: Federal budget cuts, including a $1 billion suspension in grants by the National Science Foundation, are directly impacting U.S. scientific research. 🛑 This forces research institutes to create triage plans and may lead to departments closing or drastically reducing their research components. The cuts have also resulted in the cancellation of grants for vital research, like biomedical work on uterine fibroids, causing a loss of student talent, ideas, and destroyed experiments, which experts warn will have a huge impact on the economy.

💼 Q: Which countries are attracting U.S. scientists leaving the country?

💼 A: U.S. scientists considering leaving the country are being actively recruited by departments in Europe, Australia, and China. 💶 The European Union and France have proactively pledged a half-billion euros in grants to entice scientists, while Canada is also a popular destination. 📈 Since the beginning of the funding cuts, the number of U.S.-based scientists seeking employment outside the country has risen by 30 percent.

📚 Book Recommendations

↔️ Similar

• 💡 Science the Endless Frontier by Vannevar Bush. This is the foundational 1945 report that created the modern U.S. science funding model (including the National Science Foundation), which the video argues is now under threat.
• 🧪🏛️ The Science of Science Policy: A Handbook edited by Kaye Husbands Fealing, Julia I. Lane, John H. Marburger III, and Stephanie S. Shipp. This handbook explores the need for an evidence-based platform for science policy, analyzing the changing framework of innovation and how policymakers should manage investments in research.

🆚 Contrasting

• 💸 Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion by Daniel S. Greenberg. This book offers a skeptical, behind-the-scenes look at the science funding system, arguing that it is often corrupted by false claims, pork, and cronyism where science, money, and politics manipulate one another.
• 🚫 The Economic Laws of Scientific Research by Terence Kealey. Kealey, a contrarian, argues that scientific research would actually be better off without government support because public funding often crowds out more effective private investment.

🎨 Creatively Related

• 🧪📣🏛️ Science with Impact: How to Engage People, Change Practice, and Influence Policy by Anne Helen Toomey argues that science faces a public-relations crisis due to its emphasis on trickle-down research and offers a guide for scientists to build public trust and communicate with policymakers for real-world impact.
• 🏛️ Science Funding: Politics and Porkbarrel by Joseph Paul Martino. A critical examination of how political criteria, congressional micromanagement, and the favoritism of massive Big Science projects compromise the integrity and efficiency of the science funding system.