Home > Videos

🧠🛠️🕸️🚫🙅‍♂️💼 No Vibes Allowed: Solving Hard Problems in Complex Codebases – Dex Horthy, HumanLayer

📝🐒 Human Notes

$$\text{Performance}=\frac{{\text{Correctness}}^2\times \text{Completeness}}{\text{Size}}$$

• 🚀 To optimize performance
  • ✅ 1. Maximize correctness
  • 🧩 2.1 Maximize completeness
  • 🤏 2.2 Minimize size

🤖 AI Summary

🤖 Context Engineering & The Dumb Zone

• 📉 LLMs have a dumb zone - performance degrades significantly when the context window fills up (around 40% capacity).
• 🧹 Intentional compaction is required to keep the context window in the smart zone by compressing file contents and conversation history into concise summaries.
• 🚫 Vibes and naive chatting with coding agents lead to slop - low-quality code that creates technical debt and rework.

🏗️ The RPI Workflow (Research, Plan, Implement)

• 🔍 Research: Before coding, the agent must investigate the codebase to understand the system, identifying relevant files and ground truth without making changes.
• 📝 Plan: Generate a detailed markdown plan with specific file names, line numbers, and testing strategies; this step is crucial for human review and mental alignment.
• 🛠️ Implement: The agent executes the plan using the researched context, minimizing the risk of errors or hallucinations.

🧠 Mental Alignment & Human Oversight

• 🤝 Mental alignment replaces deep code review; humans review the plan (intent) rather than just the final code, allowing for faster velocity without losing control.
• ❌ Do not outsource thinking; AI amplifies existing thought processes but cannot replace the fundamental engineering judgment required to spot a bad plan.
• 📉 Spec-driven development has suffered semantic diffusion (becoming a meaningless buzzword), making specific workflows like RPI necessary for clarity.

🏭 Brownfield vs. Greenfield

• 🌿 AI tools often shine in greenfield (new) projects but struggle in brownfield (legacy/complex) codebases without rigorous context management.
• 🏢 To solve hard problems in complex systems, engineers must treat context as a scarce resource and actively manage what the model sees.

🤔 Evaluation

The strategies presented in this video align with cutting-edge industry findings on 🔬 Large Language Model (LLM) limitations, specifically the Lost in the Middle phenomenon where models struggle to retrieve information from the middle of long contexts. While the speaker brands this the Dumb Zone 🧠, the underlying technical reality is well-documented by researchers from Stanford and UC Berkeley 🎓. The RPI (Research, Plan, Implement) workflow effectively operationalizes Chain of Thought prompting into a software engineering lifecycle 🛠️, enforcing a system 2 (deliberate, slow) thinking process on the AI 🚀.

However, the approach heavily relies on the user’s discipline to actually review plans 📝 - a behavior that often degrades under deadline pressure ⏰. Reliable sources like Google’s Site Reliability Engineering principles 🌐 suggest that manual review steps are often bottlenecks 🚧; future iterations of this workflow may need automated plan validators to scale 📈. Additionally, while the video dismisses Spec-Driven Development as a buzzword 🗣️, the RPI method is ironically a rigorous implementation of functional specifications, just rebranded to avoid semantic fatigue 💡.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

📉 Q: What is the Dumb Zone in AI coding?

📉 A: It is the point at which an LLM’s context window becomes so filled with noise (files, chat history, test output) that its reasoning capabilities degrade, typically around 40% utilization.

📝 Q: How does the Research-Plan-Implement (RPI) workflow prevent slop?

📝 A: By forcing the AI to gather facts (Research) and outline exact steps (Plan) before writing code (Implement), RPI prevents the hallucinated logic and low-quality code churn known as slop.

🧠 Q: What is Mental Alignment in this context?

🧠 A: It is the state where the human engineer understands how and why the AI is changing the codebase by reviewing a high-level plan, rather than getting lost reading thousands of lines of generated code.

👴 Q: Why do standard AI tools fail on Brownfield projects?

👴 A: Standard tools often dump too much irrelevant context into the window or lack the system understanding to navigate complex, legacy (brownfield) architectures without specific context engineering.

📚 Book Recommendations

↔️ Similar

• 🧱🛠️ Working Effectively with Legacy Code by Michael Feathers – Essential for understanding the brownfield environments where AI agents often struggle and where RPI is most needed.
• The Checklist Manifesto by Atul Gawande – The Plan phase of RPI functions like a surgical checklist, preventing errors through rigid adherence to a pre-validated process.

🆚 Contrasting

• ⚡🚫💭 Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell – Argues for the power of vibes (rapid cognition and intuition), directly contrasting the video’s No Vibes / deliberate planning philosophy.
• 📉🧪🚀 The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses by Eric Ries – Focuses on rapid iteration and build-measure-learn, which can sometimes conflict with the heavy Research & Plan front-loading advocated here.

🎨 Creatively Related

• 🤖🏗️ AI Engineering: Building Applications with Foundation Models

• 🤔🐇🐢 Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman – The RPI workflow effectively forces the AI (and human) out of System 1 (fast, intuitive) and into System 2 (slow, deliberative) thinking.
• 🚶‍♂️🧠 Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything by Joshua Foer – Explores the limits of human memory and context, mirroring the context engineering required to manage the limited memory of LLMs.