π‘ππ€ Build a Prompt Learning Loop - SallyAnn DeLucia & Fuad Ali, Arize
π€ AI Summary
- π€ Agents fail primarily due to weak environment instructions, lack of planning, and poor context engineering rather than model weakness. [02:33]
- π Prompt learning improves performance by using English feedback and explanations from evaluations to update system instructions iteratively. [06:31]
- π Adding specific rules to a system prompt increased coding agent performance by 15 percent without architecture changes or fine tuning. [10:41]
- π‘ Overfitting in prompt learning serves as building expertise for specific tasks rather than being a flaw in generalization. [12:34]
- π Reliability depends on a dual loop system where both the agent prompt and the evaluator prompt are co evolved and optimized. [15:15]
- π§ͺ Evaluation should start with simple success criteria and convert to automated metrics as understanding of failures matures. [17:15]
- π οΈ Building a prompt learning loop involves generating outputs, scoring them, and passing reasoning back to a meta prompt for refinement. [43:02]
π€ Evaluation
- βοΈ Traditional fine tuning methods often focus on weight updates which require massive datasets.
- π Research by the Stanford Natural Language Processing Group in the paper titled Language Models are Few Shot Learners demonstrates that while scale helps, task specific guidance is crucial.
- π§© Exploring the trade offs between static chain of thought prompting and dynamic prompt learning can provide deeper insights into cost efficiency for production agents.
β Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
π§ Q: How does LLM prompt learning differ from traditional reinforcement learning?
π€ A: Traditional reinforcement learning updates model weights based on scalar rewards, whereas prompt learning updates the text of the system instructions based on natural language feedback and reasoning. [05:31]
π Q: What is the risk of overfitting during LLM prompt optimization?
π€ A: While traditional machine learning views overfitting as a negative, in this context it is viewed as developing domain expertise for a specific codebase or environment. [12:45]
π― Q: Why are explanations more valuable than simple binary scores for LLM prompt optimization?
π€ A: Large language models operate in the text domain, so rich text explanations provide the specific reasoning needed to correct complex instruction following errors that a simple score cannot convey. [08:40]
π Book Recommendations
βοΈ Similar
- β¨οΈπ€ Prompt Engineering for LLMs: The Art and Science of Building Large Language Model-Based Applications by John Berryman explores techniques for structuring instructions to maximize model performance.
- π§ π»π€ Deep Learning by Ian Goodfellow provides the foundational theory behind the neural networks that these agents utilize.
π Contrasting
- π€βπ§ β‘οΈ Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction by Richard Sutton focuses on the mathematical and scalar reward systems that prompt learning seeks to augment or replace.
- π Statistical Rethinking by Richard McElreath emphasizes Bayesian approaches to data which prioritize uncertainty over the deterministic rule sets used in agents.
π¨ Creatively Related
- πΊπͺπ‘π€ The Design of Everyday Things by Don Norman offers insights into how instructions and environments should be crafted for better user and agent interaction.
- π€ππ’ Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman describes the dual systems of thought that mirror the planning and execution phases of advanced AI agents.