bagrounds.org

6 min read

Home > Videos | 🔬🛡️ Science Under Siege: How to Fight the Five Most Powerful Forces That Threaten Our World

🔬🛡️🤥 Authors of ‘Science Under Siege’ warn of concerted effort to discredit science

🤖 AI Summary

  • 🌍 A concerted group of global actors including billionaires, leaders of nation states, and credentialed experts work to confuse and mislead the public about basic scientific principles [00:30].
  • 🚨 Powerful vested interests focused a whole lot of firepower on scientists to try to discredit them, to intimidate them, and to get them fired from their jobs [02:09].
  • 📈 The now well-known “hockey stick curve” demonstrated how unprecedented the warming of the past century is, implicating human-caused climate change due to increased carbon pollution from fossil fuel burning [01:49].
  • 💉 Public health scientists, like those targeted in the climate arena, found themselves under attack in precisely the same way, using the same tactics and even some of the same players [02:22].
  • 🚫 The first assertion that initiated the anti-science backlash in biomedicine was the false claims of vaccines causing autism [03:05].
  • 🧮 The aligned actors—plutocrats, petrostates, propagandists, and the press—are against the basic principles that carbon pollution is warming the planet and that vaccines have saved millions of lives [03:34].
  • 💰 Attacks on science are deliberate, politically motivated, and financially motivated, distinguishing them from random misinformation or an infodemic [05:09].
  • 💊 The health wellness influencer industry views objective scientists as bad for business for stating that therapeutics like ivermectin do not work for COVID-19 [05:27].
  • 🗣️ Scientists need to step up to the table and demand that any policy-based discussions be premised on an objective and accurate understanding of what the science actually has to say [06:44].
  • 💔 The aggressive anti-vaccine movement is basically tearing down the whole infrastructure for vaccinating the world’s children, making the accomplishment of creating a low-cost COVID vaccine alone insufficient [07:34].

🤔 Evaluation

  • ⚖️ The video’s core argument for a concerted war on science is strongly supported by research on organized disinformation.
  • 📚 Academic analysis detailed in Merchants of Doubt by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway outlines the historical playbook used by corporations to manufacture doubt on issues from tobacco to climate change, aligning with the video’s description of organized campaigns.
  • 🏛️ Furthermore, tracking efforts, such as the Silencing Science Tracker from the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University, document government-level attempts since 2016 to restrict scientific research and discussion, validating the authors’ claim of science being under siege.
  • 👥 However, the analysis in the video, which focuses heavily on the financial and political source of the attacks (plutocrats and petrostates), can be contrasted with social science perspectives that focus on the recipient of the message.
  • 🧠 Research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) explains that people often reject scientific messages not due to ignorance, but because the information conflicts with their deeply held beliefs, values, or social group identity, creating cognitive dissonance.
  • 🎯 This perspective suggests that the anti-science trend is often collateral damage—a spillover from orchestrated conservative distrust of government—as argued in Daedalus by the MIT Press Direct, rather than solely an attack on the science itself.

Topics to Explore for a Better Understanding:

  • 💡 The epistemic and cultural drivers of anti-science attitudes, focusing on the role of cultural cognition and group identity in polarizing public views on consensus science.
  • 🐢 The prevalence of “climate delay” strategies, which have largely replaced outright denial; these tactics, as noted by the UNDP, aim to obstruct necessary policy action by emphasizing the cost, feasibility, or unintended consequences of climate solutions.
  • 🛡️ The efficacy of “prebunking” (inoculating people against misinformation before they encounter it) versus traditional fact-checking, as a strategy to build critical thinking skills against climate and health disinformation simultaneously (IPI Global Observatory).

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: 💰 What are the main financial and political forces driving the modern anti-science movement?

A: 🌍 The primary forces, according to the video, are plutocrats (wealthy individuals/groups funding dark money organizations), petrostates (nations like Russia and Saudi Arabia that oppose a clean energy transition), propagandists (conservative media promoting anti-science narratives), and the press (legacy outlets guilty of false framing and “performative neutrality”). 🎯 These groups are financially and politically motivated to discredit scientific consensus on issues that threaten their vested interests.

Q: 🤝 How is the spread of climate change misinformation related to vaccine hesitancy?

A: 🔗 The attacks on climate science and vaccine science are often linked because they are perpetrated by overlapping networks that use the same tactics and sometimes the same players. 📣 The core strategy involves generating skepticism toward scientific authority and consensus, which can then be applied to both climate change (e.g., denying human causation) and public health (e.g., claiming vaccines are unsafe or ineffective).

Q: 📰 What role does the media play in the “War on Science”?

A: ⚖️ The media contributes to the problem in two ways: promoting propagandists like Fox News and the Wall Street Journal who explicitly push anti-science narratives, and perpetuating false framing through performative neutrality. 🎙️ Performative neutrality involves placing anti-science viewpoints on equal footing with the consensus of the world’s scientists, giving misinformation undue credibility and confusing the public about where the scientific consensus actually lies.

📚 Book Recommendations

Similar: Organized Disinformation and Scientific Consensus

Contrasting: Psychology, Trust, and Decision-Making

  • 🤔🐇🐢 Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman
    • 🧠 Explains the two systems that drive thought—System 1 (fast, intuitive) and System 2 (slow, logical)—providing a foundational understanding of the cognitive biases that make people vulnerable to emotionally charged misinformation.
  • Why Trust Science? by Naomi Oreskes
    • ❓ Shifts focus from who is attacking science to why we should trust it, arguing that scientific trust is warranted not because individual scientists are unbiased, but because the scientific community’s process is inherently collective and rigorous.
  • It Can’t Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis
    • 🗳️ This 1935 novel offers a cautionary tale about the rise of a populist, authoritarian political leader in America, providing a crucial fictional parallel for how political movements can become weaponized against objective reality and institutions.
  • 🔬🔄 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn
    • 💡 Explores how major scientific advancements occur through “paradigm shifts” rather than linear progress. It helps readers understand that challenges to scientific consensus (even legitimate ones) are often revolutionary and that science is a human process, offering context to the skepticism scientists face.

🐦 Tweet

Graph View

Backlinks