bagrounds.org

7 min read

Home > Books

😇🧠 The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion

🛒 The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

📝🐒 Human Notes

  • 😇👿 We are all self-righteous hypocrites
  • 🪢🙈 Morality binds and blinds
  • 💰🧬 Transactional vs transformational leadership
  • 🐘🤔 Intuitions come first, strategic reasoning second
    • 🔎 Exploratory thought - ⚖️ fair consideration of alternatives
      • 🗣️ Prompted when you know you’ll be accountable to a discerning audience with unknown views
    • ✅ Confirmatory thought - ➡️ one sided attempt to rationalize a point of view
    • 💖 Self esteem is based on our understanding of other people’s evaluation of us
    • 🔎✅ Confirmation Bias - 👀 we look for reasons to confirm our instincts, not to refute them
    • ⚖️ Can vs must
      • 💖 Want to believe? Ask: can I?
      • 💔 Don’t want to believe it? Ask: must I?
  • 🌍 Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic (WEIRD)
    • 🧠 More analytical than relational
    • 🧍individualistic, 📜 rule based, 🌐 universalist
  • ⚖️ 6 Moral Foundations
    • ❤️‍🩹 Care / 🤕 Harm
    • 🤝 Fairness / 🦹 Cheating
    • 🗽 Liberty / ⛓️ Oppression
    • 🫂 Loyalty / 💔 Betrayal
    • 👑 Authority / 💣 Subversion
    • ⛪ Sanctity / 💩 Degradation
  • 🫏🙈 Democrats appeal to the first 3
  • 🐘😇 Republicans appeal to all 6
  • 🐝 The Hive Hypothesis
    • 🐒🐝 Humans are 90% Chimp, 10% bee
    • 🧬 Humans are conditional 🐝 hive creatures
    • ⏱️ We can temporarily, 🤩 ecstatically lose ourselves in something greater than ourselves, like a collective consciousness or shared experience. 🤯
    • 💃 dance, 🏞️ awe in nature, 🍄 psychedelics
    • 🥰 oxytocin, 🪞 mirror neurons 😊. The way our brains are wired contributes to our hive mentality.

📚 Books Mentioned

🔗 Links

🤖 AI Summary

TLDR

🤔 Human morality is built on 🧠 evolved psychological foundations that 🧍 vary across individuals and 🤝 political groups, leading to 💔 deep divisions rooted in 🧭 differing moral intuitions rather than 💡 solely in reason or 📰 facts.

Deep Dive 🧠

⚖️ Jonathan Haidt’s “The Righteous Mind” ⚖️ delves into the 🧠 psychological origins of morality 🤔 and its role in ➡️ political 🏛️ and religious 🙏 divisions. He argues that 🗣️ moral 😇 reasoning is often ⏰ post-hoc rationalization of pre-existing moral 🤔 intuitions, rather than a purely logical 💡 process.

📚 Topics and Methods:

  • ❤️‍🩹⚖️🤝👑😇🗽 Moral Foundations Theory: 👨‍🏫 Haidt proposes six (originally five) foundational moral values:
    • 🩹 Care/Harm
    • ⚖️ Fairness/Cheating
    • 🤝 Loyalty/Betrayal
    • 👑 Authority/Subversion
    • ⛪️ Sanctity/Degradation
    • 🗽 Liberty/Oppression (added later)
  • 🐘 The Elephant and the Rider: 🐴 Haidt uses this metaphor to illustrate the relationship between intuition (the elephant 🐘) and reason (the rider 🧑‍💼). The elephant 🐘 represents our automatic, emotional responses 😭😠😡, while the rider 🧑‍💼 is our conscious, rational mind 🤔. The rider 🧑‍💼 often serves to justify the elephant’s 🐘 actions.
  • 🧠 Moral Intuitions First, Strategic Reasoning Second: 🎯 Haidt argues that moral judgments are primarily driven by gut feelings and intuitions 😲, with reasoning coming later to support those judgments 🧐.
  • 👥 Groupishness: 🐝 Haidt examines the evolutionary origins of morality 🐒, emphasizing its role in promoting cooperation and cohesion within groups 🤝. He explores how humans are “90% chimp 🐒 and 10% bee 🐝,” meaning we are both individualistic 🙋‍♀️🙋‍♂️ and group-oriented 🧑‍🤝‍🧑.
  • 🌍 Cultural Psychology: 🗺️ Haidt draws on cross-cultural studies to demonstrate the variability of moral values across different societies 🏘️.
  • 🗳️ Political Psychology: 🏛️ The book explores how moral foundations differ between liberals 💙 and conservatives ❤️, explaining the deep divisions 💔 in political discourse 🗣️.

🔬 Research and Theories:

  • 👨‍🏫 Haidt draws on a wide range of research in 🧠 psychology, 🗿 anthropology, and 🧬 evolutionary biology.
  • 🧩 He synthesizes findings from 📈 studies on moral development, 👥 social psychology, and 🧠 neuroscience.
  • 🌳 The book is grounded in 🧬 evolutionary psychology, suggesting that 🤔 moral intuitions are ⚙️ adaptations that evolved to solve specific 🤝 social problems.
  • ✍️ He uses a lot of 🗣️ anecdotal and 🤔 personal observation, that is then 🔬 backed up with 🧪 scientific studies.

📚 Critical Analysis:

  • 👨‍🏫 Author Credentials: Jonathan Haidt is a highly respected social psychologist with a strong academic background. 🎓 His work is widely cited and influential. 🌟
  • 🔬 Scientific Backing: The book is supported by a substantial body of research, 📊 although some aspects of Moral Foundations Theory are still debated. 🤔
  • 📰 Authoritative Reviews: “The Righteous Mind” has received widespread acclaim from both academic and popular reviewers. 🎉 It has been praised for its insightful analysis of political and moral psychology.🧠👏
  • 💯 Quality of Information: The information presented is of high quality, 👍 although some argue that the theory oversimplifies the complexity of human morality. 🤯
  • 💡 The theory has been used in many different fields, from business 🏢 to politics 🏛️, showing the practical value of the mental model. 🌍✨

💡 Practical Takeaways:

  • 🤝 Understanding Others: 🧠 Recognizing that people have different moral foundations 🧱 can help us understand 🧐 and empathize 🤗 with those who hold different political 🏛️ or religious ✝️ views.
  • 🗣️ Improving Communication: 📢 By understanding the role of intuition 💭 in moral judgment, ⚖️ we can communicate 💬 more effectively 👍 with those who disagree 👎 with us.
  • 💔 Reducing Political Polarization: 🌍 Haidt suggests 💡 that bridging the moral divide 🌉 requires understanding 🤔 and respecting 🙏 the moral values 🌟 of different groups. 🧑‍🤝‍🧑
  • 🧘 Self Awareness: 🤔 Understand your own moral foundations, 🧱 and how they influence 💫 your judgement. ⚖️

Book Recommendations 📚

💬 Gemini Prompt

Summarize the book: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Start the summary with a TLDR - a single statement that conveys a maximum of the useful information provided in the book. Follow this with a deep dive. Catalogue the topics, methods, and research discussed. Be sure to highlight any significant theories, theses, or mental models proposed. Provide a critical analysis of the quality of the information presented, using scientific backing, author credentials, authoritative reviews, and other markers of high quality information as justification. Emphasize practical takeaways. Make the following additional book recommendations: the best alternate book on the same topic, the best book that is tangentially related, the best book that is diametrically opposed, the best fiction book that incorporates related ideas, and a random book that everyone should read. Format your response as markdown, starting at heading level H4, with inline links, for easy copy paste. Use meaningful emojis liberally to enhance readability, especially in headings and as bullets for lists.

🐦 Tweet

Graph View

Backlinks

🤝 Bridge divides. 🛒 Get 😇🧠 The Righteous Mind on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.