Home > Articles

😴💰🏛️🤑👴🇸🇪 ‘We got lazy and complacent’: Swedish pensioners explain how abolishing the wealth tax changed their country

🤖 AI Summary

• 👴 Swedish pensioners observe the erosion of the welfare state they built, viewing the abolition of the wealth tax as a catalyst for social decline.
• 📉 We became lazy and complacent, assuming the welfare model was permanent while failing to realize society was shifting toward a haven for billionaires.
• 💰 The wealth tax was historically framed as a practical, non-political tool to fund essential public services like schools, dental care, and sports for children.
• 🚪 Its removal in 2006 was initially seen as a pragmatic administrative fix rather than a radical ideological shift toward neoliberalism.
• 🏗️ A once-natural culture of collective contribution has been replaced by individualistic desires to minimize personal tax burdens and accumulate private wealth.
• 😰 Concerns persist that current generations will lack the social security and public infrastructure that protected their parents during the post-war era.

🤔 Evaluation

• 🧪 The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER): In the paper Taxing Top Wealth: Migration Responses and their Aggregate Economic Implications, researchers found that while abolishing the wealth tax reduced the out-migration of wealthy entrepreneurs by 30%, the overall economic spillover effects on employment and investment were modest.
• 📉 Association for Heterodox Economics: In The Swedish Welfare Model: Counter-arguments to Neoliberal Myths, economist Daniel Ankarloo argues that the disarray of the Swedish model was not caused by high taxes, but by deliberate neoliberal policy shifts starting in the 1980s.
• 🎓 SH DiVA (Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet): A peer-reviewed dissertation from Lund University notes that the abolition of inheritance and wealth taxes was framed by politicians as a pragmatic administrative fix to avoid a normative debate on ethics.
• 🔍 World Inequality Database (WID): Managed by the Paris School of Economics, this database shows that while Sweden’s tax-to-GDP ratio remains high, the specific burden on capital has decreased significantly since the mid-2000s, allowing private wealth to accumulate at the top.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

🇸🇪 Q: Why did Sweden decide to abolish its wealth tax in 2007?

🇸🇪 A: The right wing Swedish government of the 1980s removed the tax in line with right wing political movements in the UK under Margaret Thatcher and the US under Ronald Reagan.

🏘️ Q: How has the removal of the wealth tax impacted Swedish society?

🏘️ A: Critics and elderly citizens argue it has increased wealth inequality and signaled a move away from the folkhemmet or people’s home model toward a society that prioritizes individual wealth accumulation.

📚 Book Recommendations

↔️ Similar

• 📘 The Leap of Faith The Fiscal Foundations of Successful Government in Europe and America by Sven Steinmo explores the historical development of the Swedish tax state and its reliance on high citizen compliance.
• 📖 Swedish Taxation since 1862 An Overview by Magnus Henrekson and Mikael Stenkula provides a detailed historical account of the evolution of the Swedish tax system and its various reforms.

🆚 Contrasting

• 💰📉➡️📈🗳️ The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and the Birth of the People’s Economy by Stephanie Kelton explains the principles of Modern Monetary Theory, arguing that taxes function primarily to control inflation and redistribute power rather than to fund the government.
• 📗 The Haves and the Have-Nots by Branko Milanovic provides a global history of inequality and how nations like those in Scandinavia have attempted to balance wealth concentration with social stability.

🎨 Creatively Related

• 📓 The Swedish Theory of Love by Henrik Berggren and Lars Trägårdh describes the Swedish model of statist individualism where the state supports individual autonomy to enable authentic relationships.
• 💰📈🌍⏳ Capital in the Twenty-First Century by Thomas Piketty provides the global theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between capital accumulation and modern inequality.