bagrounds.org

5 min read

Home > Articles

🤖🧠📈⚡ Code execution with MCP: Building more efficient agents

🤖 AI Summary

  • 🛠️ Tool definitions overload context, forcing agents to process vast tokens before a request when connected to many tools.
  • 🔄 Intermediate tool results consume extra tokens because full documents must flow through the model’s context, often flowing twice.
  • 🐌 Inefficiency increases cost and latency for agents.
  • 💻 Code execution presents MCP servers as code APIs instead of direct tool calls to boost context efficiency.
  • 🔎 Progressive disclosure allows agents to explore a tool file tree and load only needed definitions on-demand, dramatically cutting token use.
  • 🧠 Agents achieve context efficient tool results by filtering and transforming large datasets in the execution environment, passing only small, relevant data back to the model.
  • ✨ Powerful, context-efficient control flow uses code patterns like loops and conditionals, eliminating chained tool calls and model-level waits.
  • 🛡️ Privacy-preserving operations keep intermediate results within the execution environment, preventing data you do not wish to share from entering the model’s context.
  • 🔐 Sensitive data is tokenized automatically by the MCP client before reaching the LLM, protecting PII during the workflow.
  • 💾 State persistence and skills are maintained via files, letting agents resume work and save reusable functions, building an evolving toolbox of high-level capabilities.
  • ⚠️ Code execution introduces complexity, requiring a secure, sandboxed environment with resource limits and monitoring, which adds operational overhead and security concerns.

🤔 Evaluation

  • ✅ This model aligns with research on secure LLM agent design, which argues for principles like least privilege according to the paper LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles from OpenReview.

  • 🔑 By loading only necessary tools via progressive disclosure, the agent inherently follows the least privilege principle, reducing its exposure to unnecessary systems and data.

  • 🤝 The focus on PII sanitization through tokenization is a known strategy, reinforced by commercial tools like Kong AI Gateway, which offer similar services for securing agent interactions (AIMultiple).

  • 🛑 A necessary caution is that high flexibility introduces challenges; a contrasting perspective from a Comparative Analysis of LLM Agent Frameworks (Jose F. Sosa on Medium) highlights that conversational or code-heavy systems like AutoGen can be unpredictable and need more engineering for stability.

  • 🚧 The move from direct tool calls to agent-generated code requires a significant increase in security engineering and robustness, a trade-off the article correctly acknowledges.

  • ❓ Topics to explore for better understanding include the sandboxing and isolation techniques Anthropic uses to safely run LLM-generated code.

  • 📊 A deeper look at the cost-benefit analysis of setting up and maintaining a secure execution environment versus the token cost savings (e.g., the 98.7% reduction claim) would provide practical insight.

  • 📝 Further investigation into the governance and compliance rules for storing agent-persisted code and intermediate data (“skills”) on the filesystem is needed.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

⚙️ Q: What is the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and how does code execution make it better?

⭐ A: The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard connecting large language model (LLM) agents to external tools and data. 🚀 Code execution improves it by treating tools as code libraries. The agent writes and runs code in a secure environment to interact with tools, only loading what it needs and processing large data outside the model’s context, which drastically cuts down on token usage and increases speed.

🤫 Q: How does code execution improve the security and privacy of LLM agents?

👁️ A: Code execution boosts security by ensuring privacy-preserving operations; intermediate results stay in a local execution environment, preventing data from being exposed to the model’s context. 🛑 Also, the MCP client automatically tokenizes sensitive data like PII before the LLM sees it, protecting data integrity even during processing.

💰 Q: What are the main efficiency problems with traditional LLM agent tool-calling?

📉 A: Traditional tool-calling causes two main issues: context window overload and intermediate result token consumption. 📚 When many tools are connected, loading all definitions upfront consumes hundreds of thousands of tokens. 📄 Furthermore, large tool results, like full document transcripts, must pass through the model’s context multiple times for multi-step tasks, slowing down the agent and spiking costs.

📚 Book Recommendations

↔️ Similar

🆚 Contrasting

  • 🤖🧑‍ Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control: 🤖 Stuart Russell’s book explores the deep, philosophical problem of ensuring AI is aligned with human values, a vital consideration that counterbalances the purely engineering-focused efficiency gains discussed in the article.
  • The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and Human Values: 🧭 Brian Christian’s work details the complex, human-value-based challenges of AI, contrasting with the article’s technical focus on context window optimization and control flow, highlighting risks that persist even with efficient systems.

🎨 Creatively Related

  • 🧼💾 Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship: 🧑‍💻 Robert C. Martin’s book emphasizes core software engineering principles for writing readable, maintainable code, which is foundational for the LLM agent’s task of writing and managing its own complex code to interact with external systems.
  • Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software: 🧩 This classic resource on structuring complex software by creating reusable, robust solutions relates directly to the agent’s ability to persist its code as reusable “skills” on a filesystem.

Graph View

Backlinks