Home > Articles

πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™€οΈπŸ’ΌπŸ‘₯ Agents

πŸ€– AI Summary

πŸ€– Agents are 🎯 anything that can perceive its environment and act upon that environment.
🧠 AI is the brain that βš™οΈ processes the task, πŸ—ΊοΈ plans a sequence of actions, and πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™€οΈ determines whether the task has been accomplished.
πŸ”‘ The πŸ“ˆ success of an agent depends on the tools it has access to and the strength of its AI planner.

πŸ› οΈ Tools

πŸ”Œ External tools make an agent πŸš€ vastly more capable, allowing it to both πŸ‘οΈ perceive the environment (read-only actions) and ✍️ act upon it (write actions).
πŸ“š Knowledge augmentation tools πŸ’‘ augment the agent’s knowledge, such as πŸ“„ text retrievers, πŸ–ΌοΈ image retrievers, and πŸ“Š SQL executors.
🌐 Web Browse is an umbrella term for tools that 🌍 access the internet, preventing models from becoming ⏳ stale and enabling access to πŸ“° up-to-date information.
πŸ’ͺ Capability extension tools πŸ“ˆ address inherent limitations of AI models, such as βž• calculators for math, πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» code interpreters for execution, and πŸ—£οΈ translators for language.
🎨 Tools can also turn πŸ“ text-only or πŸ–ΌοΈ image-only models into 🌟 multimodal models by leveraging other models (e.g., DALL-E for image generation).

πŸ—ΊοΈ Planning

🧠 Foundation models are used as planners to πŸ’‘ process tasks, πŸ“Š plan action sequences, and βœ… determine task completion.
❓ An open question is how well foundation models can plan, with some researchers believing autoregressive LLMs 🚫 cannot plan effectively.
πŸ” Planning is fundamentally a search problem, involving searching among different paths to a goal and predicting outcomes.
πŸ”™ While some argue autoregressive models cannot ↩️ backtrack, they can πŸ”„ revise paths or πŸ”„ start over if a chosen path is not promising.
🚧 Planning failures can occur due to 😡 hallucinated action sequences or incorrect parameters.
πŸ’‘ Tips for better planning include ✍️ writing better system prompts, πŸ“š giving better tool descriptions, ♻️ refactoring complex functions, πŸš€ using stronger models, and πŸ§‘β€πŸ« finetuning models for plan generation.
πŸ“ž Function calling is the process of invoking tools, where tools are described by their execution entry point, parameters, and documentation.
πŸ“ Planning granularity refers to the level of detail in a plan; a detailed plan is harder to generate but easier to execute, while a higher-level plan is easier to generate but harder to execute.
hierarchical planning can circumvent this trade-off by generating high-level plans first, then more detailed plans for each sub-section.

🚨 Agent Failure Modes and Evaluation

πŸ“‰ Compound mistakes mean that overall accuracy decreases as the number of steps an agent performs increases.
πŸ’° Higher stakes tasks mean failures could have more severe consequences.
⏱️ Efficiency concerns relate to agents consuming significant API credits or time for multi-step tasks.
🧐 When working with agents, it’s advised to always ask the system to report what parameter values it uses for each function call and inspect these values for correctness.

πŸ€” Evaluation

The article presents a clear and concise framework for understanding AI agents, focusing on their components, capabilities, and challenges. It effectively defines agents and elaborates on the critical roles of tools and planning. The comparison with Anthropic’s blog post highlights conceptual alignment while emphasizing the unique focus on planning, tool selection, and failure modes in this article.

To gain a better understanding, it would be beneficial to explore:

  • βš–οΈ Real-world case studies: 🌍 Practical examples of successful and unsuccessful agent deployments across various industries could provide deeper insights into their practical implications and limitations.
  • πŸ“Š Quantitative evaluation metrics: πŸ“ While the article discusses failure modes, more specific quantitative metrics and benchmarks for evaluating agent performance beyond anecdotal evidence would be valuable.
  • πŸ”¬ Advancements in planning for LLMs: 🧠 Further research or recent breakthroughs addressing the skepticism around LLMs’ inherent planning capabilities would be an interesting area to investigate.

πŸ“š Book Recommendations